New Penalty Idea

You are missing something, or have a cool idea for us ? Tell us here !

Moderator: FSAirlines Staff

alasizon
FSAirlines DB and Wiki Admin
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:08 am
Location: PHX

Re: New Penalty Idea

Post by alasizon » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:40 am

Olbi wrote:What if we fly on VATSIM ? We can get direct intersection which is behind airport or we can get hold on 34000ft like on Madeira. When big events appear i know holdings for 2 hours on 34000ft ! So...
People choose to fly on VATSIM on their own, however it is not required for FSA as FSA is intended to be an independent self-relying system.
Matt-FSAirlines DB Admin
Image

User avatar
Brian Peace
Chief Pilot
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:24 pm
Location: Cardston, Alberta
Contact:

Re: New Penalty Idea

Post by Brian Peace » Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:41 am

Yes but the admins have told us time and time again that they would not restrict US from how WE want to fly. So why should we possibly get penalized for flying a procedure we are told to by a controller in an event by this type of a penalty, when it was our choice and our desire to fly on vatsim? If that's the case then we could bring up the whole "you should get penalized for flying at 16x" arguement... same thing.
MAINLAND PILOTS CLUB
http://bcnorth.tripod.com/

Image
Image

User avatar
Kodiak_CYXD
Ticket Agent
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:22 am
Location: CYXD

Re: New Penalty Idea

Post by Kodiak_CYXD » Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:52 pm

As much as I would love to live in a Bubble while at my Sim, I don't. And neither can most of YOU. Family, Friends. Pets, Work and the other Brazillion things we have get in the way of play. The frustration of re-filing a plan mid-air and pick up the radios you have been dropped to "Ignore" while rapidly turning Jet Fuel into White Streaking Clouds... That's about enough penalty. Should I be Virtually Killed-Off for a recent experience of an affectionate Pet inadvertantly tripping the airbrakes over threshold? I fly As Reas as It Gets and often host Multiplayer. 1X hops for the love of Flying but even live students can expect me to have to answer the Doorbell.
Image

j4cko56
Flight Attendant
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:43 pm
Contact:

Re: New Penalty Idea

Post by j4cko56 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:22 pm

Brian Peace wrote:Yes but the admins have told us time and time again that they would not restrict US from how WE want to fly. So why should we possibly get penalized for flying a procedure we are told to by a controller in an event by this type of a penalty, when it was our choice and our desire to fly on vatsim? If that's the case then we could bring up the whole "you should get penalized for flying at 16x" arguement... same thing.
No, i fly at x16 and i have done for ages, because i am revising for exams, and there for m are only 2 ways of doing long haul, x16, or overnight flight while im asleep, and overnight ones i cant do offten because it uses alot of electrisity. Unless i use x16 ill be stuck to small regional flights! And ill be honest, i dont fly the proper procedures, i get from A to B, i can do this because my laptop cant come with AI!

Jack
ImageImage
http://legacair-virtual.tk/
CEO, Legacair Virtual Airlines

Dyl963
Ticket Agent
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:29 am

Re: New Penalty Idea

Post by Dyl963 » Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:11 am

I agree with that 100%!

Post Reply