Hi,
Yes, I know, this has been debated to death already but we never get nearer a solution. Would it be easier to just have a penalty for lights not on when wheels leave runway or when wheels touch runway i.e. they must at least be on for take-offs and landings. That would at least make all operating differences allowable and solve the high altitude airport problems as well. It also fixes the problems on payware aircraft that have landing lights mapped to nosewheel and switch off when gear retracts.
Please can we give some serious consideration to this.
Regards
John
Lights penalty
Lights penalty
CEO - Classic British Flight Services
Classic aircraft on Classic routes
Classic aircraft on Classic routes
Re: Lights penalty
That is a good idea.
It would also eliminate a penalty (that I have incurred) for landing lights off while taxiing.
Currently if a pilot turns off the landing lights after vacating the active or leaves them off while taxiing to the h/p, as required, and the a/c hops due to a scenery issue, the client very kindly dings the user.
G
It would also eliminate a penalty (that I have incurred) for landing lights off while taxiing.
Currently if a pilot turns off the landing lights after vacating the active or leaves them off while taxiing to the h/p, as required, and the a/c hops due to a scenery issue, the client very kindly dings the user.
G
Re: Lights penalty
Using bete04 i have just got a landing lights penalty and i have not even pushed back yet to start my flight.
Yours Stan
Re: Lights penalty
And what about the Flythemaddog landinglights problem?
Regards
Regards
AEROTRANS, FLYING HIGH FLYING FUN
-
- FSAirlines Developer
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:40 am
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Lights penalty
well, I don't think anything has changed there. But if someone knows how the Maddoglights work, maybe can develop a little workaround, if there isn't already one.
Konrad - FSAirlines Developer