Page 3 of 4

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:13 pm
by Redhmt
Ah sorry, misunderstood your question. I think my answer still applies though as in another post I read that if anyone ran out of money to get in touch with support and they would give you more, so that leads me to believe that you would not get any income from flights, at least thats what I think happens.

I think the new client was only released as an ALPHA test ( not BETA as I earlier stated) to test its functionality to track flights.

I hope I am not still misunderstanding your question, if I am wrong I imagine someone will correct me :)

Phil

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:20 pm
by DaKurt
hmm, that not exactly right. although it's an alpha the income should be added to the pilot and airline. The additional money for accounts on fsairlines.net was because of f.e. crash testing, or landing on wrong airports in order to check the client. Those flights cost you a lot of money which I can manually add to the accounts.

I will have a look at your account tomorrow to check what happend with your income.


cheers

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:29 pm
by DaKurt
ok Stan. I looked up your log and your salaray is somehow calculated wrong (it's negative, although you made some profit?!) This is very strange, because the last thing that the client does with the Salary-Value is to check if it's negative...and change it to 0 if it is negative...

I'll include some better debuging soon, to clarify such problems...

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:59 pm
by vaccaro
OK.
Heres something from me.
Did a flight LGAV-LTBJ.
After takeoff, client and also website show me TAKEOFF until I landed (it changed to LANDED or ON BLOCKS can't remember well).
It recorded my LL was on above 10000 (got penalty) but no speed penalty even though I was speeding at 400 knots below 10000.

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:16 pm
by hercules130
enroute now.
for the time no problems.
i prefer the old method of fuel add.
i dont like fs9 fuel calculator-it sucks!!!
the old is the best.
more in flight messages will be better.

End for now .

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:57 pm
by hercules130
So here the results of my flight and what i observe.
LGTS-LGAV
Dh8C/FL140
When i finished the flight the client says that i flew for 00:33 minutes.
The site at flight record says that i flew for 00:56 minutes. The second is correct.
Nothing else to report as a bug.

Only that:PLEASE and again PLEASE return to the old FUEL status.
Its the Best.

Thanks

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:40 pm
by flightsimer
vaccaro wrote:OK.
Heres something from me.
Did a flight LGAV-LTBJ.
After takeoff, client and also website show me TAKEOFF until I landed (it changed to LANDED or ON BLOCKS can't remember well).
It recorded my LL was on above 10000 (got penalty) but no speed penalty even though I was speeding at 400 knots below 10000.
ya same thing happened to me...

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:40 am
by DaKurt
flightsimer wrote:
vaccaro wrote:OK.
Heres something from me.
Did a flight LGAV-LTBJ.
After takeoff, client and also website show me TAKEOFF until I landed (it changed to LANDED or ON BLOCKS can't remember well).
It recorded my LL was on above 10000 (got penalty) but no speed penalty even though I was speeding at 400 knots below 10000.
ya same thing happened to me...

I put this on my "known problems" list. I'll fix it :)

Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:51 pm
by hercules130
will u return to the old fuel calc??

Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:33 pm
by DaKurt
yes :)

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:15 pm
by pita
Hello all,

I've already .Net 1.1, 2.2, 3.0 and 3.5 installed. But I've always the message :
"This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem. "

Any solution or should I uninstall all .Net libraries and re-install again ?

Thanks,

Pita

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:21 pm
by DaKurt

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:14 am
by CAPFlyer
DK, I installed the package and I'm still getting the error.

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:41 am
by pita
I have already also the Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition installed on my computer (complete version). Normally, I don't have to install this package again, I suppose ?

Pita.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:48 am
by pita
I don't know what happened but today, it works for me. I didn't do anything special.

Pita