Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:23 pm
by Jon.M
Terror wrote:
30% of the market share.
:D :D True.

Followed by derision.

Jon

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:36 am
by cmdrnmartin
We are, as always, investigating thoroughly.

Just so you know, this sort of thing isn't tolerated, and you'll see repercussions.

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:51 am
by joefremont
Personally I think its up to the CEO's and the pilots if they use compression or not, they already get less revenue because of the lower bonus. Personally I have more respect for someone who watches that 8000nm flight zip at 16x than someone who sleeps through that same flight at 1x.

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:54 am
by Terror
Compression is not the problem. Using the fsnav feature of move aircraft to here to skip several thousand miles is. But the mods are dealing with it.

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:58 am
by Wolfar100
Ok I see that the airline in question has so far cleaned up their act. But what about all the flights that happened and the statistics where they vaulted into first place? :?

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:28 am
by CAPFlyer
I'm not sure how many times we can say this - IT WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF.

I'm locking this thread as I see no further use for it except for more whining about how long it takes to get this resolved and taken care of.