Re: Premium Accounts.
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:27 pm
only thing i would be curious about is what percentage of the people that voted for CEO to pay were actually CEO's...
You volunteered to do it as a free service and now that they are offering to credit you some membership time for doing that you complain about price? Be happy they are crediting you for your work.lukas wrote:Do you really think that translating 1047 sentences and hundreds of words is worth 6.00€? (price of gold membership per year)
I don't see how the Ticket Factor is stupid?Independance wrote:Would be possible to get rid of that stupid Ticket Factor with Premium Account?
And what about different pax seat's numbers for 2 class or charter flights?
Regards
It is stupid, because it creates fake economy, same like accelerated flights, flying 747 to places like Santa Catalina etc...alasizon wrote:I don't see how the Ticket Factor is stupid?
I know for what TF was created and I don't talk about Concorde. I'm talking about aircrafts like BAC111 or AN24. Those aircrafts can be operated profitable without TF what I proved in the other posts some times ago.Brian Peace wrote:ticket factor is the sole thing that allows airlines to operate aircraft like the concorde...
No. The economics will not be changed. As the only person required to get any premium account level is the CEO, we either remove the Ticket Factor or we don't. Your previous statements about not needing the TF was based on erroneous data and we showed you why. If you don't accept that reasoning, then that's your choice, but to continue bringing it up, more importantly, being rude and disrespectful in the way you do it, does not make us any more likely to change it.Independance wrote:Would be possible to get rid of that stupid Ticket Factor with Premium Account?
This has already been addressed previously. We will be revising the passenger and seating system in the future. Again, this will be across-the-board.And what about different pax seat's numbers for 2 class or charter flights?
Not to be overly sarcastic, but if it's pointless to discuss, then why did you ask the question?Independance wrote:...I don't want to discuss that any further, because it is pointless, just want to know the answer for my two questions by FSA Admins.
Great that was what I wanted to hear. Without all that fuss it created.CAPFlyer wrote:No. The economics will not be changed.
My behavior has nothing to do with FSA economy. But You think I'm rude, so You won't change it. So let it be...CAPFlyer wrote:...being rude and disrespectful in the way you do it, does not make us any more likely to change it.
Thank You.CAPFlyer wrote:This has already been addressed previously. We will be revising the passenger and seating system in the future. Again, this will be across-the-board.
Yes as always.CAPFlyer wrote:Please do not make me edit this thread anymore. There is no need for calling anything "stupid", much less getting rude with other users. The forum rules are clearly laid out for everyone, you break them, we will discipline.
Pointless is the discussion about TF. I wanted the answer if it would be removed or not. I got my answer, so I will not be asking or replying anything else.CAPFlyer wrote:Not to be overly sarcastic, but if it's pointless to discuss, then why did you ask the question?