FSAirlines

I think I found the problem, the server has a limit on the number of data items that can be submitted from a form, which defaults to 1000. You have around 1600 flights you were trying to edit. So the server received the first 1000 route id's and the remaining flights and the instructions from the bo...

If you continue to go down that list I suspect eventually you will find the one that has the problem.

Just looked at the flights you specified for your airline and wow, you have a lot of aircraft on each route, I suspect one of them is reaching some internal limit and its causing something to brake, I will try to debug it.

I have made available a new version of XPUIPC from german-xflight.de , the new version is 2.0.5.9 and I have updated the link above. I have not found any change logs after 2.0.4.8 but those logs can be found here: https://german-xflight.de/forum/resources/xpuipc.3/ The previous version is still avai...

Very odd that the weights between the CFM and IAE version are so different, I wonder what excuse they will come up with to explain it. I had dealings with them in trying to figure out fuel usage, at times, for some reason when we read the fuel levels during the flight, the amount of fuel in the fuel...

We just someone else ask the same question as a support ticket. Most probably its the weights, check the values in the aircraft.cfg files, based on our database they should be this: [weight_and_balance] max_gross_weight = 166449 empty_weight = 87579 If not you may want to contact FlightsimLabs and s...

We had thought about other expenses from time to time but never came to a conclusion. I had figured some day we would have an 'advanced economics' feature that could include parking fees, gate fees and status decline for unused aircraft but there would need to be some plus to it, some increased reve...

Sorry it too so long to notice, Apache was having issues and I restarted it yesterday, it’s been running ok since then.

Check it now.

ITs not so much the number of times, damage is calculated by how much force the plane received when it hits the runway, if you land at or below MLW at 200fps or less very little damage will be received, as the speed and weight increases, damage will be more.

We have now adjusted the 206G's mtow to better reflect the older aircraft and added a T206H to reflect the new model.

And remember exceeding the landing weight is a warning, not a penalty, there is no rating deduction associated with it.

Hi Flyers. Recently we have had a number of pilots who have complained saying "I booked a flight to A and the client said I landed a B' when in fact they booked a flight to B and landed at A. Meaning they did not book the flight to the airport they planned to. To help reduce this I made two small ch...

Mostly what it looks at are weights, empty and loaded, since the -8 is heavier if you were to adjust the aircraft.cfg file you would throw off the flight model of the aircraft. And if we ever put in a payload checker in the client you would be at a disadvantage using a -400 as a -8. And since -400's...

In some we we already have our own cyber currency, V$, but I know that's not what you mean. The biggest problem is that is the idea of paying our pilots for virtual flights with these "currencies" its that these have become actually value of them has gone up quite a lot, so how we would pay for thes...

A big thank you to the FSA-Team for the quick solution of the Problem. I would like to take the credit but I really did not do anything. I think it was more of a general internet issue, there were no strange entries in the logs, no programs that stuck and had to be restarted, but activity on the se...