FSAirlines

Hmm.. Managed to get a first flight in a 500 with v1.0.3 and for some reason, the aircraft burned from the LH tank only. Didn't realise this until landing/unhooking the AP (AP covering tank gauges when open) when the aircraft slewed to the right in a big way. Also.. FS crashed when closing the clien...

Hi John/Tomasz :D Yup.. 109 was considered 'high density' though Autair (amongst others) actually specified 119 :shock: BEA's 99 started life as 97 as they had 2 rear seats removed and an extra bar fitted. Not sure exactly why they removed the bar but 99 is how they ended up :wink: It'll be interest...

Hi Tyler :D I've not had the opportunity to fly today but yes.. I've had problems with the main site being slow and pages not coming up despite 'Done' being shown on the bottom LH of the browser. I'm not sure if it was a particularly 'heavy traffic' period as it seems to have sped up a bit now :wink...

:lol: :lol: :lol: It's late and thus took me a while to get my head around that Tomasz but yes.. your figures add up too and well done that man :wink: The thing I'm not really sure of here is cargo but.. on the figures we have.. 99x102kg = 10098kg. This will leave an additional cargo revenue opportu...

John.. Will we still be able to earn some revenue off cargo on the 500's?? I seem to remember that on certain routes.. the 500 would earn more than the T3, purely because of an income off cargo :D I think I have to agree with Tomasz in that a 109 figure was more typical than 99 for the 500 but that ...

HI Matt..

I've had similar a few times.. using the back button usually gets rid of it No idea why it happens though

ATB

DaveB

Hi Tomasz..

Just checked my log and it was 109 for the 500's not 119 although up to 119 could be accommodated on the 500 (5 abreast) at 29in (0.74m) pitch. However, it was more common to have less pax and increased seat pitch

ATB

DaveB

Hi Tomasz :) The 3 Omani 1-11's with freight doors are I suppose a different aircraft series to those already included on the database being 485G. As they're based around the 475srs, I guess the figures would be much the same so.. perhaps if you wanted to operate them as freighters.. you could eithe...

Exactly so Chris :wink: We made hay while the sun shone with aircraft like the Trident3 and Vanguard, both of which, since the introduction of MZFW show realistic operating figures :D Previous to this, their U/C would've collapsed at the ramp! :lol: It was fun making the extra money but the current ...

Hi Joe.. Dunno if this is any use to you. I think these figures are what we based a lot of our calculations on over at CBFS. Typical Operating Weight Empty (varies with customer fit) Srs200.. 21,049kg Srs300.. 22,098kg Srs400.. 23,050kg NAL400.. 23,505kg Srs475.. 23,464kg Srs500.. 24,758kg Maximum P...

Matt..

I've seen the same too and presumed it was just me writing the info down incorrectly It's not so much the next day but at the end of the flight. Check the figures before the start then check em again at the end. They will have reversed

ATB

DaveB

I think you hit the proverbial nail on the head there Graham :wink: The 'entire' landing light 'thing' isn't really within RW parameters for older aircraft.. in mind I list almost everything British-built of a certain age. Vickers/early BAC had landing lights which extend from the wing and as such, ...

There you go amb and thanks Joe

ATB

DaveB

Hi amb.. Yes.. sorry for not looking back further. Looking at your airlines activity, it's done 20flights since FSA v100 was released. Some pilots did not fly until 26th (6 days after v100) or later and it seems to be these (2 pilots.. Maximiliano Manzini - NFY412 and Jose Miguel Alonso - NFY402) th...

Claudio/Joe (et-al).. Re flight duration reports on the client.. The mismatch on timing reported earlier only appears to be with certain aircraft.. that is low and slow ones. The way off reports the client has given me up to now have not been replicated on a flight this afternoon EGLL-EDDM. Aircraft...