Search found 148 matches
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:58 pm
- Forum: Bugs & Problems
- Topic: Antonov 225 cheat flights
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7800
Re: Antonov 225 cheat flights
The AN225 needs to be 1.711 also. Thanks Stan, that is useful. :) Shame that some administrators would rather jump into criticism than read the question posed. As pointed out, in the thread linked to, and nowhere else in the forum, was there any information on this issue for the AN225. Is it not so...
- Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:41 pm
- Forum: Bugs & Problems
- Topic: Antonov 225 cheat flights
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7800
Re: Antonov 225 cheat flights
See this topic for 124, dont know if its the same for 225 though.
http://www.fsairlines.net/forum/viewtop ... f=5&t=4675
http://www.fsairlines.net/forum/viewtop ... f=5&t=4675
- Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:43 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Premium Accounts.
- Replies: 123
- Views: 82565
Re: Premium Accounts.
Been away and only just up to speed on this topic. When the announcement about premium accounts was first posted we were told that they would be optional. With the current proposals it seems that single pilot operations will have only one option, make the regular payments or become inactive and then...
- Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:46 pm
- Forum: Bugs & Problems
- Topic: Client and Squawk Box
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4636
Re: Client and Squawk Box
Those menu tabs are disabled by the client to prevent various cheating methods being utilised whilst flying on FSAirlines.
I fly on VATSIM with the FSA client using the FSInn client instead of Squawkbox.
/G
I fly on VATSIM with the FSA client using the FSInn client instead of Squawkbox.
/G
- Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:54 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Premium Accounts.
- Replies: 123
- Views: 82565
Re: Premium Accounts.
I stand corrected and thanks for clarifying, but a reply to my mail would only have taken a minute.
/G
/G
- Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:34 pm
- Forum: Bugs & Problems
- Topic: Valueless aircraft
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2403
Re: Valueless aircraft
Ok
Thanks.
/G
Thanks.
/G
- Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:17 am
- Forum: Bugs & Problems
- Topic: Valueless aircraft
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2403
Valueless aircraft
Hi
I recently flew my Golden Eagle to Oxford.
For some reason this flight has reduced the value of the aircraft to 0v$, even though it is still at 98.7% status.
Any help appreciated
http://www.fsairlines.net/index.php5?st ... 321&p=8266
/G
I recently flew my Golden Eagle to Oxford.
For some reason this flight has reduced the value of the aircraft to 0v$, even though it is still at 98.7% status.
Any help appreciated
http://www.fsairlines.net/index.php5?st ... 321&p=8266
/G
- Thu Dec 03, 2009 9:10 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Premium Accounts.
- Replies: 123
- Views: 82565
Re: Premium Accounts.
I asked by email over a week ago whether the proposed limits would be monthly or weekly, and if so by rolling 7-days, calender or some other criteria. The lack of any kind of reply suggests that the developers themselves have no clue yet how this should/could be implemented. ;) It is clear that the ...
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:53 pm
- Forum: New features & ideas
- Topic: Hard Landings
- Replies: 20
- Views: 13896
Re: Hard Landings
I have been monitoring my landing rates to try to figure out why the client reports them wrong. Have noted: 1) The client shows an inflated vertical speed on those occasions where the ding-dong comes while the aircraft is still in the air (about 20% of the time) 2) The client shows a zero vertical s...
- Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:36 am
- Forum: New features & ideas
- Topic: New Penalty Idea
- Replies: 34
- Views: 20368
Re: New Penalty Idea
Very interesting about the trains, especially from admin who complain about off topic replies
Anybody with views on the proposed penalty??
/G
Anybody with views on the proposed penalty??
/G
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:34 pm
- Forum: Bugs & Problems
- Topic: Leasing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2910
Re: Leasing
Make sure you have selected "open" in the drop down box for Recipient in the lease form.
/G
/G
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:42 pm
- Forum: New features & ideas
- Topic: New Penalty Idea
- Replies: 34
- Views: 20368
Re: New Penalty Idea
Remeber the radius we are talking about is only 3nm from the airports coodinates. Yes, but many procedures are based on a VOR or NDB which is actually located on the airfied (0nm from airport coordinates). You can be required to fly (or hold) here at over 10000ft AGL as noted above. Surely FSA does...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:07 pm
- Forum: New features & ideas
- Topic: New Penalty Idea
- Replies: 34
- Views: 20368
Re: New Penalty Idea
Reasonable, we can say there is no penalty if you are less than 5000ft AGL. Still not high enough. ;) Procedures at LOWI involve crossing the destination at 9500AMSL (which is 7600ft above threshold elevation) due to surrounding terrain. I am sure there are many other examples. Notwithstanding the ...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:49 pm
- Forum: New features & ideas
- Topic: New Penalty Idea
- Replies: 34
- Views: 20368
Re: New Penalty Idea
if you are within 3nm of your destination and your above 18,000ft MSL or above 1/2 your maximum altitude the client dings Same objection as above. Eg: I fly from EGGD to EGFF at 6000 (the SID limit), but must cross the NDB on the destination airfield at 4000 to fly the procedure for ILS12 (or 30). ...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:37 am
- Forum: New features & ideas
- Topic: New Penalty Idea
- Replies: 34
- Views: 20368
Re: New Penalty Idea
It would also "catch" pilots flying a published procedure where the arrival level over the alpha beacon happens to be the same as cruise level (eg on a short flight).
If implemented maybe it should only apply above a certain FL?
/G
If implemented maybe it should only apply above a certain FL?
/G